Monday, February 22, 2010
Nappy Hair By Carolivia Herron
This controversial picture book points out that black people have hair that can be nappy. The cover of the book has a young black girl who is looking up at her dark hair with the title "Nappy Hair" written in white to stand out. The background is red, which compliments the dark color of her hair. The endpaper is white and has a picture of the young girl skipping along withe the title colored with primary colors. The story begins with an old man stating that the story happened at a backyard party. I thought this to be helpful for me as a reader to think that this was a "true story" and that young black girls go through situations similar to the one in the book. The illustrations have very little white in them, the sky is even a bright colored orange and sometimes purple. I think that the illustrator did this because the people in the book are of black skin and the orange goes well with brown. Because the story took place at a backyard picnic, there are two different fonts in the book. One font is what the family says to the girl, and the other is the girls response. If I were to read this book to my class, I think it would be a good way to the students to get involved by staying the young girls response. I think that this book shows that everyone is different, include their hair and it is okay. This book could teach a lesson that looks and images are not important and sometimes it is out of a persons control, like the girls hair. I think it was a happy ending because the young girl was proud of her uniqueness and dealt with the fact that she had nappy hair.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I read this book too. I think you do a great job analyzing the way the book looks- color schemes, fonts, illustrations, etc.
ReplyDeleteI think you could say a little more about why the book is controversial and how you would respond to people who think it is innapropriate to read in class. I thought this was the most controversial book of all 6 that I read because it could be interpreted as racist against white or non-black people. The scene where she is in the classroom giving a speech and is called "a rose among thorns" seems like the author is saying she is the only one who knows how to speak english correctly and all the other students who don't speak African American dialect are "thorns". The writer also writes something about "the old hardheads", presumably referring to the teachers/students who tell her to speak 'proper' english.
Maybe addressing scenes like this in your review would be a good idea, because I'm sure if you did read this book and didn't talk about these parts somebody else (probably a parent) would.
I didn't read this book but it sounds like something that I want to read. It sounds like it has a good ending and message to be happy with your differenes because it is who you are. I couldn't help but notice that you mentioned a lack of white color in the book which I think is very interesting. It is like a message in itself. I find it interesting that it is controversial when a book seems to be predjusice agaist whites or no black but in a lot of literature there is predjustice against those specific groups and we don't label it as controversial.
ReplyDelete